United States v. Dilliehunt
This text of 286 F. App'x 520 (United States v. Dilliehunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jerry Dilliehunt appeals from the 38-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Dilliehunt contends that the district court erred by increasing his offense level by two levels for reckless endangerment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2. We conclude that the district court’s application of the enhancement was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Reyes-Oseguera, 106 F.3d 1481, 1484 (9th Cir.1997).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 F. App'x 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dilliehunt-ca9-2008.