United States v. Diggs
This text of United States v. Diggs (United States v. Diggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6193
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANAH D. DIGGS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 04-6259
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon; Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-01-2)
Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danah D. Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia; Eric Matthew Hurt, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Danah D. Diggs appeals the district court’s orders
denying her motion for a downward departure and motion to correct
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Diggs, No. CR-01-02 (W.D. Va.
Nov. 14, 2003; Jan. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Diggs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-diggs-ca4-2004.