United States v. Diggs

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Diggs

90 F. App'x 52

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2004·No. Nos. 04-6193, 04-6259·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Danah D. Diggs appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for a downward departure and motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Diggs, No. CR-01-02 (W.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2003; Jan. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Danah D. Diggs appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion for a downward departure and motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Diggs, No. CR-01-02 (W.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2003; Jan. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Diggs, 90 F. App'x 52 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 52 (United States v. Diggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related