United States v. Difo

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Difo

615 F. App'x 666

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 10, 2015·No. No. 15-10029·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Esther Panitch, appointed counsel for Glenny Difo in this direct criminal filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Difo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Esther Panitch, appointed counsel for Glenny Difo in this direct criminal filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Difo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Difo, 615 F. App'x 666 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

615 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Difo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related