United States v. Dietz
71 M.J. 295, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 532
This text of 71 M.J. 295 (United States v. Dietz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Dietz, 71 M.J. 295, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 532 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 20081031. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE ACCA ERRED IN ITS SUMMARY DISPOSITION ON REMAND, WHEN THERE WAS NO TERMINAL ELEMENT AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 134 (EITHER EXPRESSED OR BY NECESSARY IMPLICATION), AND WHEN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IN THE FIFTH AND SIXTH AMENDMENTS GUARANTEES A CRIMINAL DEFENDANT THE RIGHT TO BE GIVEN SUFFICIENT NOTICE OF THE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST HIM, AND THIS LACK OF TERMINAL ELEMENT CAUSED UNDUE PREJUDICE AND SUBSTANTIAL HARM TO THE APPELLANT.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 295, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dietz-armfor-2012.