United States v. Dickerson
This text of 474 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[194]*194Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Juanita Jean Dickerson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006) based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dickerson, No. 3:04-cr00083-2 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the fact and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dickerson-ca4-2012.