United States v. Dick & Goldschmidt, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

United States v. Dick & Goldschmidt, Inc.

17 Cust. Ct. 400, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 996

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 6, 1946

DocketNo. 6490; Entry No. 759163

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 400 (United States v. Dick & Goldschmidt, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dick & Goldschmidt, Inc., 17 Cust. Ct. 400, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 996 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Cole, Judge:

Tbis appeal for reappraisement of woven wool fabrics bas been submitted by tbe parties 'on an agreed set of facts, establishing export value as defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) to be tbe proper basis for appraisement for tbe wool piece goods invoiced as Quality No. 7257, and that such statutory value for the said merchandise is 8 shillings per yard, less 2% per centum, plus packing.

As to tbe remaining items included in tbe shipment in question, tbe appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole, Judge:

Tbis appeal for reappraisement of woven wool fabrics bas been submitted by tbe parties 'on an agreed set of facts, establishing export value as defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) to be tbe proper basis for appraisement for tbe wool piece goods invoiced as Quality No. 7257, and that such statutory value for the said merchandise is 8 shillings per yard, less 2% per centum, plus packing.

As to tbe remaining items included in tbe shipment in question, tbe appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cust. Ct. 400, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dick-goldschmidt-inc-cusc-1946.