United States v. Dick

United States Court of Military Appeals

United States v. Dick

6 C.M.A. 243, 6 USCMA 243, 19 C.M.R. 369, 1955 CMA LEXIS 317, 1955 WL 3453

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedAugust 5, 1955

DocketNo. 6661

StatusPublished

This text of 6 C.M.A. 243 (United States v. Dick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dick, 6 C.M.A. 243, 6 USCMA 243, 19 C.M.R. 369, 1955 CMA LEXIS 317, 1955 WL 3453 (cma 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

We granted review in this case for the sole purpose of determining whether the evidence sufficed legally to sustain the finding of a general court-martial that the accused’s period of desertion had been terminated by ap-

prehension. In substance, that issue has already been decided against the defense position by our opinion in United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272. Accordingly, the findings and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

We granted review in this case for the sole purpose of determining whether the evidence sufficed legally to sustain the finding of a general court-martial that the accused’s period of desertion had been terminated by ap-

prehension. In substance, that issue has already been decided against the defense position by our opinion in United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272. Accordingly, the findings and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 C.M.A. 243, 6 USCMA 243, 19 C.M.R. 369, 1955 CMA LEXIS 317, 1955 WL 3453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dick-cma-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack