United States v. Diaz-Ramos
This text of 305 F. App'x 438 (United States v. Diaz-Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Guadalupe Diaz-Ramos appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Diaz-Ramos was indicted for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss because he was previously deported under an incorrect alien number which invalidated his prior deportation. Because Diaz-Ramos did not suffer prejudice as a result of being deported under an incorrect number, his contention fails. See United States v. Muro-Inclan, 249 F.3d 1180, 1185 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-diaz-ramos-ca9-2008.