United States v. Diaz-Navarro
This text of 314 F. App'x 80 (United States v. Diaz-Navarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Antonio Diaz-Navarro appeals from the 66-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.
Diaz-Navarro contends that the district court erred during sentencing by failing to consider all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. We conclude that there was no procedural error. See United States v. Catty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)(2)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
314 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-diaz-navarro-ca9-2009.