United States v. Diaz

227 F. App'x 873
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 6, 2007·No. No. 06-11134·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Given the lack of merit in the issue identified in Appellant’s initial merits brief as originally filed and the absence of any plain error in the district court’s acceptance of Appellant’s guilty plea, we find it unnecessary to reach the motions filed by Appellant’s counsel in a belated attempt to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Diaz, 227 F. App'x 873 (11th Cir. 2007).

227 F. App'x 873 (United States v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)