United States v. Diaz

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Diaz

227 F. App'x 873

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 2007

DocketNo. 06-11134

StatusPublished

This text of 227 F. App'x 873 (United States v. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Diaz, 227 F. App'x 873 (11th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

Given the lack of merit in the issue identified in Appellant’s initial merits brief as originally filed and the absence of any plain error in the district court’s acceptance of Appellant’s guilty plea, we find it unnecessary to reach the motions filed by Appellant’s counsel in a belated attempt to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

Given the lack of merit in the issue identified in Appellant’s initial merits brief as originally filed and the absence of any plain error in the district court’s acceptance of Appellant’s guilty plea, we find it unnecessary to reach the motions filed by Appellant’s counsel in a belated attempt to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 F. App'x 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-diaz-ca11-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack