United States v. Diaz
227 F. App'x 873
Opinion
Given the lack of merit in the issue identified in Appellant’s initial merits brief as originally filed and the absence of any plain error in the district court’s acceptance of Appellant’s guilty plea, we find it unnecessary to reach the motions filed by Appellant’s counsel in a belated attempt to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Diaz, 227 F. App'x 873 (11th Cir. 2007).
227 F. App'x 873 (United States v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)