United States v. Diaz-Acosta
This text of United States v. Diaz-Acosta (United States v. Diaz-Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 07, 2011 No. 10-11118 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00292-JSM-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS MIGUEL DIAZ-ACOSTA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________
(January 7, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Carlos Diaz-Acosta, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Diaz-Acosta’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Diaz-Acosta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-diaz-acosta-ca11-2011.