United States v. D.H.

999 F. Supp. 748, 38 V.I. 415, 1998 WL 156541, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4425
CourtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands
DecidedApril 1, 1998
DocketCrim. No. 95-37
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 999 F. Supp. 748 (United States v. D.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. D.H., 999 F. Supp. 748, 38 V.I. 415, 1998 WL 156541, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4425 (vid 1998).

Opinion

MOORE, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM

This matter is before the Court based upon the government's motion to correct judgment dated December 2, 1997. The government seeks a correction based on a perceived error in not giving the juvenile delihquent ["D.H."] credit for time served pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b).

On June 15, 1993, two U.S. Navy sailors, DC3 Michael Robert Nendze and Lt. Robert Dana Bartlett, and one U.S. Coast Guard officer, Lt. (jg) Patrick Gardella, were on liberty on St. Thomas when they were robbed at gunpoint by three assailants. Nendze was shot in the back while using the telephone. Gardella and Bartlett were held at gunpoint and beaten with a club and sustained serious injuries. Bartlett was then shot in the head. He died a week later.

On February 2, 1995, D.H. was arrested and detained as a juvenile. On February 3, 1995, D.H. was arraigned. After initially [416]*416pleading not delinquent, on February 7, 1995, the juvenile pled guilty to acts of delinquency which, if he had been an adult, would have been the felonies of assault on a federal officer, attempted murder of a federal officer and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. He remained in detention to allow observation and study.

D.H. was committed as a delinquent juvenile to 5 years of official detention on August 23,1995, under 18 U.S.C. § 5037(c)(2), with a specific direction that he serve the entire five years and that he not receive credit for time served in custody before that date.

Adjudication of a juvenile as a delinquent is a civil or quasi-criminal matter. Section 3585, on the other hand, applies to the criminal sentencing of those convicted of committing felonies or misdemeanors. Further, section 3585 applies to "defendants" which by definition are adults. By its very terms, then, section 3585 does not apply to juveniles. The only adult sentencing provision incorporated to apply to juvenile detention under the Federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-42, is credit for good time earned when serving a sentence at the Bureau of Prisons provided by section 3624, and not section 3585. See 18 U.S.C. § 5037.

Since D.H. was not criminally sentenced to a term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(a), but was instead civilly adjudicated a delinquent juvenile, he is not entitle^ to credit for prior custody under section 3585(b). An appropriate order is attached.

ENTERED this 1st day of April, 1998.

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the preceding Memorandum, it is hereby

ORDERED that the government's motion to correct judgment is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J.P.C. (JUV) v. United States
430 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. South Dakota, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 F. Supp. 748, 38 V.I. 415, 1998 WL 156541, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dh-vid-1998.