United States v. Dexter Neal

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 25, 2000
Docket00-1700
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Dexter Neal (United States v. Dexter Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dexter Neal, (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 00-1700 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Dexter Neal, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: September 12, 2000 Filed: September 25, 2000 ___________

Before McMILLIAN and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Dexter Neal appeals his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for distribution of cocaine base and cocaine. Defendant argues the District Court2 erred by denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict based upon insufficiency of the evidence, and claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

1 The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. 2 The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. We conclude the evidence presented is adequate to sustain the jury's verdict. See United States v. Hawkey, 148 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 1998) (setting out standard of review). Furthermore, we conclude that the defendant's ineffective assistance claim is not timely; we reach this conclusion without prejudice to defendant's right to bring a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Iversen, 90 F.3d 1340, 1342 (8th Cir. 1996) (dismissing ineffective assistance claim without prejudice to defendant's right to bring motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255).

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Dexter Neal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dexter-neal-ca8-2000.