United States v. Dewayne Crews

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2013·No. 12-7992·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7992

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DEWAYNE L. CREWS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-70047-NKM-1)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewayne L. Crews, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dewayne L. Crews appeals the district court’s order denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. However, because Crews served his original sentence and is now confined on a sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release, he is not eligible for § 3582(c)(2) relief. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10, p.s., cmt. n.5(A) (2012) (“This section does not authorize a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release.”); United States v. Morales, 590 F.3d 1049, 1051 (9th Cir. 2010) (same). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dewayne Crews, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Dewayne Crews (United States v. Dewayne Crews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Morales
590 F.3d 1049 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)