United States v. Desmond Burnett

466 F. App'x 381
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2012
Docket11-60272
StatusUnpublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 381 (United States v. Desmond Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Desmond Burnett, 466 F. App'x 381 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Desmond Burnett pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine and possessing with intent to distribute in excess of 5 grams of cocaine base. In his sole issue on appeal, he contends that the district court erred by refusing to apply the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010(FSA) to his sentence. His argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Tickles, 661 F.3d 212, 215 (5th Cir.2011), petitions for cert. filed (Dec. 15, 2011) (No. 11-8028) and (Dec. 27, 2011) (No. 11-8268), which held that the FSA does not apply retroactively to defendants whose sentencing occurred after the FSA’s effective date but whose offenses occurred before the effective date. Although the Supreme Court has recently granted certiorari in two Seventh Circuit cases that held that the FSA does not apply retroactively, our precedent is nevertheless binding. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 808 n. 1 (5th Cir.2008).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lopez-Velasquez
526 F.3d 804 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Tickles
661 F.3d 212 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-desmond-burnett-ca5-2012.