United States v. Derry Lorenzo Williams
This text of 62 F.3d 1416 (United States v. Derry Lorenzo Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Derry Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6201.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 25, 1995.
Decided: Aug. 10, 1995.
Derry Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-92-126-S; CA-95-32 (D.Md. Feb. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 F.3d 1416, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29129, 1995 WL 470867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-derry-lorenzo-williams-ca4-1995.