United States v. Derek Medina
This text of 633 F. App'x 361 (United States v. Derek Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Derek Andrew Medina appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We dismiss.
The government seeks the dismissal of this appeal as untimely. Although Medina received an extension of time to file a notice of appeal (“NOA”), he did not file his NOA within the time permitted by the Federal Rules. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)®, (b)(4). We must, therefore, dismiss. See United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 942 (9th Cir.2007) (when the government objects to the untimely filing of an NOA, dismissal is mandatory).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 F. App'x 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-derek-medina-ca9-2016.