United States v. Denny
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Eric Denny appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for distribution and possession of controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.
Counsel for Denny has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Denny has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 F. App'x 939 (United States v. Denny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.