United States v. Dennis Sims, United States of America v. Reginald Williams

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dennis Sims, United States of America v. Reginald Williams

543 F.2d 1089, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6417

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 3, 1976

Docket75-1714, 75-1715

StatusPublished

This text of 543 F.2d 1089 (United States v. Dennis Sims, United States of America v. Reginald Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dennis Sims, United States of America v. Reginald Williams, 543 F.2d 1089, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6417 (4th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Williams and Dennis Sims were found guilty by a jury of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and each was sentenced to a prison term of twenty-two years.

Both defendants challenge the giving of a jury instruction on common law confedera *1090 tion in addition to a charge under 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 While they concede that in their case there was abundant authority to support a charge of common law confederation, they claim that Congressional enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 2 negates the old common law theory and further argue that the charge should be applied only in conspiracy cases.

We can discern no Congressional intent to eliminate an instruction on a common law confederation by its promulgation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. An instruction on common law confederation raises a question concerning the admissibility of evidence, a theory of proof rather than offense. We therefore find that the trial judge did not err by giving both instructions. See Carpenter v. United States, 264 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 936, 79 S.Ct. 1459, 3 L.Ed.2d 1548. It is clear that the use of an instruction on common law confederation is not confined to conspiracy cases. Hilliard v. United States, 121 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 627, 62 S.Ct. 111, 86 L.Ed. 503; United States v. Sapperstein, 312 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1963).

The judgment of the district is accordingly affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 2 provides:

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Williams and Dennis Sims were found guilty by a jury of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and each was sentenced to a prison term of twenty-two years.

Both defendants challenge the giving of a jury instruction on common law confedera *1090 tion in addition to a charge under 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 While they concede that in their case there was abundant authority to support a charge of common law confederation, they claim that Congressional enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 2 negates the old common law theory and further argue that the charge should be applied only in conspiracy cases.

We can discern no Congressional intent to eliminate an instruction on a common law confederation by its promulgation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. An instruction on common law confederation raises a question concerning the admissibility of evidence, a theory of proof rather than offense. We therefore find that the trial judge did not err by giving both instructions. See Carpenter v. United States, 264 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 936, 79 S.Ct. 1459, 3 L.Ed.2d 1548. It is clear that the use of an instruction on common law confederation is not confined to conspiracy cases. Hilliard v. United States, 121 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1941), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 627, 62 S.Ct. 111, 86 L.Ed. 503; United States v. Sapperstein, 312 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1963).

The judgment of the district is accordingly affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 2 provides:

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 F.2d 1089, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dennis-sims-united-states-of-america-v-reginald-williams-ca4-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack