United States v. Dennis Paul Timmins

350 F.3d 984, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23987
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dennis Paul Timmins. Read the opinion of the Court — 301 F.3d 974
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2003·No. 00-30224·Published

Opinion

350 F.3d 984

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dennis Paul TIMMINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-30224.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed November 25, 2003.

Michael W. Mosman, Esq., USPO—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, Jonathan L. Marcus, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William S. Labahn, Esq., Law Office of William S. Labahn, P.C., Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MILTON I. SHADUR,* District Judge.

ORDER

The opinion filed in this case on July 17, 2002, and published at 301 F.3d 974 (9th Cir.2002) is ordered vacated and withdrawn. The pending petition for rehearing is denied and a unpublished decision will be filed simultaneously.

Notes:

*

The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dennis Paul Timmins, 350 F.3d 984, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23987 (9th Cir. 2003).

350 F.3d 984 (United States v. Dennis Paul Timmins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dennis Paul Timmins
301 F.3d 974 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Timmins
350 F.3d 984 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)