United States v. Dennis J. Dziedzic
This text of 443 F.2d 1366 (United States v. Dennis J. Dziedzic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
443 F.2d 1366
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dennis J. DZIEDZIC, Appellant.
No. 71-1125.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 15, 1971.
Victor Sherman (argued), of Nasatir, Sherman & Hirsch, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Shelby R. Gott, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Criminal Division, Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed. The jury instruction on sanity is caught by our Wade v. United States, 9th Cir., 426 F.2d 64, decided after the trial of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 F.2d 1366, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dennis-j-dziedzic-ca9-1971.