United States v. Dennis Clark Maxwell

444 F.2d 104, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9755
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dennis Clark Maxwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 456 F.2d 1053
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided June 8, 1971·No. 576-70_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Maxwell appeals from conviction, after trial upon facts stipulated to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, of substantively violating 18 U.S.C. § 2314 by causing, with illegal and fraudulent intent, the interstate transportation of a falsely made and counterfeit security. The written stipulation upon which the case was submitted and tried admitted all the essential elements of the subject offense.

Prior to the submission of the question of appellant’s guilt to the court Maxwell had been required by order of the court to furnish handwriting exemplars to the prosecution. Appellant objected to but complied with the order. This objection was purportedly preserved for appellate consideration in the later stipulation submitted to the court for trial and now constitutes the only issue presented to us. Although the answer to the question of the validity of the court’s preliminary order seems clear, Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178, we refuse *105 to recognize this procedure to in any way present or preserve an appellate issue.

The admitted facts support the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dennis Clark Maxwell, 444 F.2d 104, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9755 (10th Cir. 1971).

444 F.2d 104 (United States v. Dennis Clark Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. California
388 U.S. 263 (Supreme Court, 1967)