United States v. Dennis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6075
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID REID DENNIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-150-P, CA-96-216-3-P)
Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 13, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Reid Dennis, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. We find that the evidence supports
Dennis's 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1994) conviction in light of Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 148 (1995) (holding that clear ex-
amples of use include "brandishing, displaying, bartering, striking
with, and most obviously, firing or attempt to fire a firearm").
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dennis, Nos. CR-93-150-P; CA-96-216-3-P (W.D.N.C. Dec.
11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Dennis (United States v. Dennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.