United States v. Dennis

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Dennis

144 F. App'x 79

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 18, 2005

DocketNo. 05-10486; D.C. Docket No. 95-00208-CR-WS

StatusPublished

This text of 144 F. App'x 79 (United States v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dennis, 144 F. App'x 79 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Peter J. Madden, appointed counsel for Percy T. Dennis, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dennis’s revocation of supervised release and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Peter J. Madden, appointed counsel for Percy T. Dennis, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dennis’s revocation of supervised release and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 F. App'x 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dennis-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack