United States v. Denise Brown, in Re Richard A. Hamar

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Denise Brown, in Re Richard A. Hamar

557 F.2d 226

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 27, 1977·No. 77-8193·Published

Opinion

Order Assessing Penalty

Richard A. Hamar, counsel who commenced the appeal, is assessed a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00), to be paid into the Registry of the Clerk of this Court within 28 days from the date of the filing of this order for failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence.

The penalty is assessed under Rule 46(c), F.R.App.P. There are extenuating circumstances, but he should not have excused himself from “protecting the record.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Assessing Penalty

Richard A. Hamar, counsel who commenced the appeal, is assessed a penalty of one hundred dollars ($100.00), to be paid into the Registry of the Clerk of this Court within 28 days from the date of the filing of this order for failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence.

The penalty is assessed under Rule 46(c), F.R.App.P. There are extenuating circumstances, but he should not have excused himself from “protecting the record.”

United States v. Denise Brown, in Re Richard A. Hamar, 557 F.2d 226 (9th Cir. 1977).

Pincite

557 F.2d 226 (United States v. Denise Brown, in Re Richard A. Hamar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.