United States v. Demetrius Nunn
This text of United States v. Demetrius Nunn (United States v. Demetrius Nunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 00-2382 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Demetrius Nunn, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: December 21, 2000 Filed: December 29, 2000 ___________
Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Demetrius Nunn pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). The district court sentenced him to 151 months imprisonment and five years supervised release. On appeal, Nunn’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Nunn has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude Nunn knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence in the “Stipulation and Agreement Relative to Plea, Conviction and Sentencing” which served as the plea agreement. See United States v. Michelsen, 141 F.3d 867, 871-72 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 942 (1998); United States v. Greger, 98 F.3d 1080, 1081-82 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we enforce the appeal waiver, dismiss this appeal, and grant Nunn’s counsel’s motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Demetrius Nunn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-demetrius-nunn-ca8-2000.