United States v. Delvalle

76 M.J. 43, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 994
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided December 14, 2016·No. No. 17-0044/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20160157. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:

I.WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS CMCR JUDGES TERMINATED THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS OF JUDGE CELT-NIEKS AND JUDGE BURTON.
II.WHETHER, AS APPOINTED JUDGES OF THE CMCR, JUDGE CELTNIEKS AND JUDGE BURTON DID NOT MEET THE UCMJ DEFINITION OF APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGES.
III.WHETHER THE ASSIGNMENT OF INFERIOR OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS TO A SINGLE JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL ITSELF VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE.

No briefs -will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Delvalle, 76 M.J. 43, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 994 (Ark. 2016).

76 M.J. 43 (United States v. Delvalle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.