United States v. Delores Ann Tappen

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Delores Ann Tappen

488 F.2d 142

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1973

Docket73-2934

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 488 F.2d 142 (United States v. Delores Ann Tappen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Delores Ann Tappen, 488 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. The only issues sought to be raised by appellant are based on factual allegations not contained in the record, which can not be raised on direct appeal. United States v. King, 5th Cir. 1972, 456 *143 F.2d 1243. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Charles Bentley, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. The only issues sought to be raised by appellant are based on factual allegations not contained in the record, which can not be raised on direct appeal. United States v. King, 5th Cir. 1972, 456 *143 F.2d 1243. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Charles Bentley, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521; United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 F.2d 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-delores-ann-tappen-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack