United States v. Delmar Phillips

256 F. App'x 22
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 2007
Docket06-4162
StatusUnpublished

This text of 256 F. App'x 22 (United States v. Delmar Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Delmar Phillips, 256 F. App'x 22 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Delmar Phillips conditionally pleaded guilty to possessing more than 50 grams of actual methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court 1 sentenced him to 120 months in prison, the statutory minimum, and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s withdrawal motion.

First, law enforcement officers’ knowledge from a records check that Phillips was driving with a suspended license gave them probable cause to arrest him. The arrest, in turn, gave the officers authority to conduct a search of Phillips’s person incident to the arrest. Thus, the district court correctly denied his motion to suppress the drugs seized from his person. See United States v. Jones, 479 F.3d 975, 978 (8th Cir.2007). Second, the district court lacked authority to sentence Phillips below the 10-year statutory minimum. See United States v. Gregg, 451 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir.2003).

Finally, having found no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Jose A. Chacon
330 F.3d 1065 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. James Allen Gregg
451 F.3d 930 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Ron Antonio Jones
479 F.3d 975 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 F. App'x 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-delmar-phillips-ca8-2007.