United States v. Delgado
This text of 36 F. App'x 490 (United States v. Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant, German Delgado, challenges the extent of the downward departure granted by the District Court in determining his sentence. The District Court concluded that Delgado was entitled to a downward departure based upon his substantial assistance. Nonetheless, the court decided that a three-month departure was all that was indicated because appellant had an extensive history as a drug dealer and because there was a substantial quantity of the drugs involved in this offense. In effect, appellant is arguing that the District Court should have departed a total of fifteen months below his applicable Guideline range instead of three months.
We do not have appellate jurisdiction to review a challenge to the District Court’s discretionary decision, challenging the extent of a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. See United States v. Torres, 251 F.3d 138, 145 (3d Cir.2001) (citing United States v. Parker, 902 F.2d 221, 222 (3d Cir.1990)). Thus, we will dismiss this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-delgado-ca3-2002.