United States v. Delgado

36 F. App'x 490
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 2002
Docket01-3270
StatusUnpublished

This text of 36 F. App'x 490 (United States v. Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Delgado, 36 F. App'x 490 (3d Cir. 2002).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, German Delgado, challenges the extent of the downward departure granted by the District Court in determining his sentence. The District Court concluded that Delgado was entitled to a downward departure based upon his substantial assistance. Nonetheless, the court decided that a three-month departure was all that was indicated because appellant had an extensive history as a drug dealer and because there was a substantial quantity of the drugs involved in this offense. In effect, appellant is arguing that the District Court should have departed a total of fifteen months below his applicable Guideline range instead of three months.

We do not have appellate jurisdiction to review a challenge to the District Court’s discretionary decision, challenging the extent of a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1. See United States v. Torres, 251 F.3d 138, 145 (3d Cir.2001) (citing United States v. Parker, 902 F.2d 221, 222 (3d Cir.1990)). Thus, we will dismiss this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Parker, Darius
902 F.2d 221 (Third Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Charles Torres
251 F.3d 138 (Third Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 F. App'x 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-delgado-ca3-2002.