United States v. DeJuan Thornton
This text of 639 F. App'x 388 (United States v. DeJuan Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DeJuan Thornton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s 1 order committing him for treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245. To be timely, Mr. Thornton’s notice of appeal from the final judgment, entered on March 6, 2015, had to be filed by May 5, 2015. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) (providing 60 days to appeal in civil case involving government as party). The notice of appeal was filed on May 26, 2015. Even if we were to consider it to have been filed on May 19 — the date it bears, cf. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) (prison mailbox rule) — it would still be untimely, and therefore we lack jurisdiction over this civil appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir.2006) (holding that requirement of timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional, and that federal court will raise jurisdiction issues sua sponte).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and the pending motions are denied as moot.
. The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 F. App'x 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dejuan-thornton-ca8-2016.