United States v. DeJournett

820 F.3d 849, 2016 FED App. 0104P, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2351, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8144, 2016 WL 2586701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 2016
DocketNo. 14-4204
StatusPublished

This text of 820 F.3d 849 (United States v. DeJournett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. DeJournett, 820 F.3d 849, 2016 FED App. 0104P, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2351, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8144, 2016 WL 2586701 (6th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

On March 30, 2016, this court vacated the August 21, 2014, order of the district court prohibiting public access to defendant’s plea agreement. While retaining jurisdiction, we remanded the case for the limited purpose of placing on the record the district court’s justification for preventing public access. On April 26, 2016, the district court entered, an order making defendant’s plea agreement accessible to the public. The district court’s order moots the remaining issue on appeal.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
820 F.3d 849, 2016 FED App. 0104P, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2351, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8144, 2016 WL 2586701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dejournett-ca6-2016.