United States v. Deguirro

152 F. 568, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16
District Court, N.D. California·Decided October 2, 1906·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The general reasoning found in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit in the case of Dastervignes v. United States, 122 Fed. 30, 58 C. C. A. 346, has created in my mind such doubt of the correctness of my prior decision in the case of United States v. Peter Camou, filed June 24, 1902 (not reported), that I deem it proper at this time to overrule the motion to defendants for an arrest of judgment; and if dissatisfied with this ruling, the defendants have the right to bring the question involved before the Circuit Court of Appeals for decision.

The motion in arrest of judgment will be denied, and each of the defendants fined in the sum of $20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Deguirro, 152 F. 568, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16 (N.D. Cal. 1906).

152 F. 568 (United States v. Deguirro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., V
220 U.S. 502 (Supreme Court, 1911)
United States v. Rizzinelli
182 F. 675 (D. Idaho, 1910)
United States v. Louisville & N. R.
176 F. 942 (N.D. Alabama, 1910)
United States v. Grimaud
170 F. 205 (S.D. California, 1909)
United States v. Bale
156 F. 687 (D. South Dakota, 1907)