United States v. Deguirro

152 F. 568, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedOctober 2, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 152 F. 568 (United States v. Deguirro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Deguirro, 152 F. 568, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16 (N.D. Cal. 1906).

Opinion

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The general reasoning found in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit in the case of Dastervignes v. United States, 122 Fed. 30, 58 C. C. A. 346, has created in my mind such doubt of the correctness of my prior decision in the case of United States v. Peter Camou, filed June 24, 1902 (not reported), that I deem it proper at this time to overrule the motion to defendants for an arrest of judgment; and if dissatisfied with this ruling, the defendants have the right to bring the question involved before the Circuit Court of Appeals for decision.

The motion in arrest of judgment will be denied, and each of the defendants fined in the sum of $20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., V
220 U.S. 502 (Supreme Court, 1911)
United States v. Rizzinelli
182 F. 675 (D. Idaho, 1910)
United States v. Louisville & N. R.
176 F. 942 (N.D. Alabama, 1910)
United States v. Grimaud
170 F. 205 (S.D. California, 1909)
United States v. Bale
156 F. 687 (D. South Dakota, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 F. 568, 1906 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-deguirro-cand-1906.