United States v. Deft. 7
This text of United States v. Deft. 7 (United States v. Deft. 7) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal Action No. 00-425 (RWR) ) HAROLD HILL, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________)
ORDER
The Probation Office filed a petition alleging that
defendant Harold Hill violated conditions of his supervised
release. Magistrate Judge Alan Kay issued a report on April 8,
2015, recommending that Hill be monitored for a period of 30
days, with a curfew at the discretion of the Probation Officer.
No party filed any objections to the recommendation. The
recommendation is fair and just. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the report and recommendation [781] of the
magistrate judge be, and hereby is, ADOPTED. The defendant shall
undergo electronic monitoring for 30 days with a curfew at the
discretion of the Probation Officer to meet the defendant’s work
schedule. Costs of monitoring are waived.
SIGNED this 24th day of April, 2015.
/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Deft. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-deft-7-dcd-2015.