United States v. Decio Viveros Granja

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 2021
Docket20-11745
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Decio Viveros Granja (United States v. Decio Viveros Granja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Decio Viveros Granja, (11th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-11745 Date Filed: 05/20/2021 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 20-11745 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00316-VMC-CPT-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DECIO VIVEROS GRANJA,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

(May 20, 2021)

Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 20-11745 Date Filed: 05/20/2021 Page: 2 of 3

Decio Viveros Granja appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine while on board of a vessel subject to

the jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 46 U.S.C. §§ 70503(a),

70506(a) and (b), and 21 U.S.C. § 960(b)(1)(B)(ii), and sentence of 121 months’

imprisonment.

Granja’s appointed counsel in this direct criminal appeal has moved to

withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967) (when

counsel determines that a criminal defendant’s case is “wholly frivolous,” counsel

must “so advise the court and request permission to withdraw”). As required, his

counsel filed a brief setting out any irregularities or other potential errors in

Granja’s plea and sentencing processes that might arguably be meritorious. See

United States v. Blackwell, 767 F.2d 1486, 1487–88 (11th Cir. 1985) (per curiam).

His counsel notes the existence of a valid appeal waiver in the plea agreement and

says the record does not reveal that any exception to that waiver applies. He also

notes that Granja received a below-guidelines sentence. He concludes that he was

unable to find the existence of any meritorious argument on appeal.

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

2 USCA11 Case: 20-11745 Date Filed: 05/20/2021 Page: 3 of 3

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Granja’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Decio Viveros Granja, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-decio-viveros-granja-ca11-2021.