United States v. Debardeleben

19 F. App'x 130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Debardeleben. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 F. App'x 129
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2001·No. 01-6751·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James M. Debardeleben seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and *131 find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Debardeleben, Nos. CR-83-50; CA-01-30-3-2-V (W.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2001; filed Feb. 28, 2001; entered Mar. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Debardeleben, 19 F. App'x 130 (4th Cir. 2001).

19 F. App'x 130 (United States v. Debardeleben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related