United States v. De La Torre-Barrera

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 2025
Docket24-50421
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. De La Torre-Barrera (United States v. De La Torre-Barrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. De La Torre-Barrera, (5th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

Case: 24-50421 Document: 52-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 24-50421 FILED February 19, 2025 Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alejandro De La Torre-Barrera,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:23-CR-482-1 ______________________________

Before Jolly, Graves, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Alejandro De La Torre-Barrera appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) for possession of a firearm by an illegal alien. Circuit precedent forecloses his argument that § 922(g)(5) is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment following New York State

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-50421 Document: 52-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2025

No. 24-50421

Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). See United States v. Medina- Cantu, 113 F.4th 537, 538-39, 542 (5th Cir. 2024). Conceding that his argument is foreclosed, De La Torre-Barrera raises the issue to preserve it for further review. Because “there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and its alternative motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Medina-Cantu
113 F.4th 537 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. De La Torre-Barrera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-de-la-torre-barrera-ca5-2025.