United States v. De La Cerda-Guerrero

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. De La Cerda-Guerrero. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 F. App'x 957
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2002·No. 01-21225·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21225 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL DE LA CERDA-GUERRERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-81-1 -------------------- October 30, 2002

Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appointed counsel for Raul De La Cerda-Guerrero has

requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Cerda-Guerrero has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief

and has filed a response, challenging the legality of his

indictment, his guilty plea, and his sentence. Our independent

review of the brief, the record, and Cerda-Guerrero’s response

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-21225 -2-

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Cerda-Guerrero’s motion for appointment of new counsel

is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. De La Cerda-Guerrero, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. De La Cerda-Guerrero (United States v. De La Cerda-Guerrero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)