United States v. De Jesus Rodriguez

385 F. App'x 369
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 12, 2010·No. 08-41337·Unpublished

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Francisco De Jesus Rodriguez pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully in the United States after deportation following a conviction for an aggravated felony and was sentenced to a *370 33-month term of imprisonment. Rodriguez appealed his sentence, arguing that (1) the second of his possession convictions should not have been considered an aggravated felony for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) because the government failed to prove that it was committed after his first possession conviction had become final, and (2) the government failed to prove that his second conviction was secured in compliance with 21 U.S.C. § 851. We affirmed the judgment of the district court. United States v. Rodriguez, 348 Fed.Appx. 960, 963 (5th Cir.2009). After Rodriguez petitioned for a writ of certiora-ri, the Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded the case for consideration in light of Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2577, 177 L.Ed.2d 68 (2010). Rodriguez v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3457, — L.Ed.2d - (2010). In accordance with the Su- ’ preme Court’s ruling in Carachuri-Rosen-do, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for resentencing.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. De Jesus Rodriguez, 385 F. App'x 369 (5th Cir. 2010).

385 F. App'x 369 (United States v. De Jesus Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rodriguez
348 F. App'x 960 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder
560 U.S. 563 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Rodriguez v. United States
177 L. Ed. 2d 1049 (Supreme Court, 2010)