United States v. Dawodu
This text of United States v. Dawodu (United States v. Dawodu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and PENNIX Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Nurudeen O. Dawodu Aviation Structural Mechanic Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900321
Decided: 21 April 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Aaron C. Rugh Sentence adjudged on 9 August 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for eight months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1
For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry, USMCR
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
1 The convening authority suspended confinement in excess of six months pursu- ant to a pretrial agreement. United States v. Dawodu, NMCCA No. 201900321
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor- rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Dawodu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dawodu-nmcca-2020.