United States v. Dawkins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dawkins

45 F. App'x 298

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2002·No. No. 02-6888·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Dawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions correctly construed as requesting relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dawkins, No. CR-95-9 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2002). Dawkins’ motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Dawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions correctly construed as requesting relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dawkins, No. CR-95-9 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2002). Dawkins’ motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Dawkins, 45 F. App'x 298 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

45 F. App'x 298 (United States v. Dawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related