United States v. Davis

20 C.M.A. 27, 20 USCMA 27, 42 C.M.R. 219, 1970 CMA LEXIS 771, 1970 WL 7050
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 C.M.A. 217
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided August 14, 1970·No. No. 22,939·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

On his plea of guilty, the accused was convicted by a special court-martial convened at Camp Hansen, Okinawa, of a number of offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. He now contends that under O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969), he could not be tried for two of the offenses which were committed outside the area of United States military installations on the island. We considered the same contention in United States v Ortiz, 20 USCMA 21, 42 CMR 213, decided this date, and determined that the limitation on court-martial jurisdiction promulgated in O’Callahan is inapplicable in Okinawa. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, 20 C.M.A. 27, 20 USCMA 27, 42 C.M.R. 219, 1970 CMA LEXIS 771, 1970 WL 7050 (cma 1970).

20 C.M.A. 27 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Callahan v. Parker
395 U.S. 258 (Supreme Court, 1969)
United States v. Ortiz
20 C.M.A. 21 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)