United States v. Davis
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 96-20611 Summary Calendar _____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LOUIS BERNARD DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CR H 95-235-4) _________________________________________________________________ April 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Louis Bernard Davis is a codefendant of Deon Tarral
McDaniel, both having been charged with robbery and use of a
firearm in a crime of violence. Davis also pleaded guilty and
was sentenced with McDaniel. Davis appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and sentence. The pertinent facts of both appeals are
identical, and Davis raises essentially the same claims as
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
1 McDaniel. We disposed of McDaniel’s claims in United States v.
McDaniel, No. 96-20610, which was issued today, and for the
reasons given in McDaniel, we AFFIRM Davis’s guilty-plea
conviction and sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.