United States v. Davis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 F.3d 82
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1997·No. 96-20611·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20611 Summary Calendar _____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LOUIS BERNARD DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CR H 95-235-4) _________________________________________________________________ April 16, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louis Bernard Davis is a codefendant of Deon Tarral

McDaniel, both having been charged with robbery and use of a

firearm in a crime of violence. Davis also pleaded guilty and

was sentenced with McDaniel. Davis appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence. The pertinent facts of both appeals are

identical, and Davis raises essentially the same claims as

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 McDaniel. We disposed of McDaniel’s claims in United States v.

McDaniel, No. 96-20610, which was issued today, and for the

reasons given in McDaniel, we AFFIRM Davis’s guilty-plea

conviction and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.