United States v. Davis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 F. App'x 556
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2006·No. 06-7054·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7054

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARION MADISON DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:96-cr-00053-HCM)

Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 20, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Madison Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Marion Madison Davis appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to require the Government to file a Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 2:96-cr-00053-HCM

(E.D. Va. May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.