United States v. Davis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEROLD LEE DAVIS, a/k/a Jerry G. Davies, a/k/a Arnold Lietzey, a/k/a Gerold L. Davis, a/k/a John Reid, a/k/a Jerry Davies, a/k/a Gerald K. Davis,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenwood. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-2007-8-13, CR-93-429)

Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 2, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerold Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Gerold Lee Davis appeals the district court’s order denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the

district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence.

We have reviewed the record and the district court opinion and find

no reversible error. The district court’s order also denies relief

on Davis’ recusal motion. Davis does not challenge this portion of

the district court’s order. Therefore, this issue is not preserved

for appeal. 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CA-

97-2007-8-13; CR-93-429 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED