United States v. Davis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6060

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KYLE ANTON DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-95-122, CA-00-410)

Submitted: April 3, 2002 Decided: April 16, 2002

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kyle Anton Davis, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kyle Anton Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s orders:

(1) dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion; (2)

denying his motion for summary judgment and motion for

reconsideration; and (3) denying his motion alleging bias pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 144 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Davis, Nos. CR-95-122; CA-00-410 (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, Dec. 1 &

Dec. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED