United States v. Davis

21 F. App'x 167
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2001·No. 01-6273·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gerold Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, No. CR-93-429 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, 21 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2001).

21 F. App'x 167 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.