United States v. Davis
Opinion
Herbert Davis appeals the district court’s order construing his motion challenging the computation of his sentence as a habeas petition and transferring it to the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where he is currently incarcerated, on that basis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis, No. CA-00-3608 (D.S.C. Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.