United States v. Davis

36 F. App'x 36
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 F. App'x 566
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 17, 2002·No. No. 01-2818·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, John Davis, argues on appeal that his counsel was ineffective for failing to request a downward adjustment under U.S.S.G 3B1.3. He argues that he was a minor participant in the conspiracy. Appellant also argues that his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to a two-level upward adjustment for the possession and use of a special skill. Because both of these arguments raise issues of fact that must first be resolved by the District Court, we conclude that neither issue is ripe for appeal. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Forte, 806 F.2d 73, (3d Cir.1986) (An appellant may not raise ineffective assistance of counsel in a direct appeal when there is an insufficient record for appellate review.) Accordingly, we will dismiss the appeal.

TO THE CLERK:

Please file the foregoing opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, 36 F. App'x 36 (3d Cir. 2002).

36 F. App'x 36 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related