United States v. Davis
573 F. App'x 925
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 4, 2014·No. No. 12-12928·Published·Cited by 19 cases
Opinion
Petitions for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Davis, 573 F. App'x 925 (11th Cir. 2014).
573 F. App'x 925 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lofton v. State
854 S.E.2d 690 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)
United States v. De Andre Smith
967 F.3d 1196 (Eleventh Circuit, 2020)
James Steiner v. United States
940 F.3d 1282 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)
United States v. Devaughn Dorsey
Ninth Circuit, 2019
United States v. Ellis
270 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (N.D. California, 2017)
United States v. Octavious Hastings
676 F. App'x 932 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Aaron Graham
824 F.3d 421 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Pembrook
119 F. Supp. 3d 577 (E.D. Michigan, 2015)
United States v. Quartavious Davis
Eleventh Circuit, 2015
United States v. Lang
78 F. Supp. 3d 830 (N.D. Illinois, 2015)
United States v. Ashburn
76 F. Supp. 3d 401 (E.D. New York, 2014)
United States v. White
62 F. Supp. 3d 614 (E.D. Michigan, 2014)
United States v. Rogers
71 F. Supp. 3d 745 (N.D. Illinois, 2014)
United States v. Giddins
57 F. Supp. 3d 481 (D. Maryland, 2014)
United States v. Banks
52 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (D. Kansas, 2014)
United States v. Javier Guerrero
768 F.3d 351 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)